Powered By Blogger

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Standardized testing

Patricia Deubel, the author of , “Accountability, Yes. Teaching to the Test, No, “quotes Rick Stiggins who said, “Unfortunately, such testing has become synonymous with NCLB. The consequence: What gets left behind in the key decision making are the ‘day-to-day’ classroom assessments, which represent 99.9 percent of the assessments in a student’s school life.” The article was about standardized testing. Deubel writes about the flaws of the old and new systems, and her opinions on how to fix standardized testing. I found that I agree with the article on most arguments. I believe that standardized testing is meaningless. I agree with Deubel that there are other ways to show a student’s knowledge and improvement (i.e. portfolios). I think states should find other ways to test students, and I think states should make testing worthwhile by implementing consequences for teachers and students. Deubel wrote that states test students with the cheapest and easiest tests to grade.
The questions I have about the topic would be is there ever going to be a change in testing? So many people and educators want to see a change in the way students are tested so will we ever see a change happen? The only way to make change is to advocate for the cause. When I become a teacher I will voice my opinions on standardized tests.
I would say I am a smart person. I always did well in school, but on standardized tests I would always do really badly. When I was younger I would try on them, but I think I lost focus half way through the test. As I got older I would not do well on the tests because I did not care about them. Teachers did not care about how we did. The only test that I cared about passing was the test I needed to pass to graduate. I only cared about it because I wanted to graduate. The article mentions that most teachers do not stress standardized tests so most students do not try their best. That is how it was when I was in elementary school. My teachers always said, “try your best, but it does not count.” I work with elementary kids and I know that they take two standardized tests a year. I personally think they are over testing children now. I understand that the state wants to see improvement in the children over the school year, but it takes two complete weeks out of the school years to do this. This is taking time away from valuable learning. Also, most children do not care about the test, but rather the snacks and drinks they receive during testing week.
I am not a huge fan of standardized tests, but I do believe we need to evaluate a student’s knowledge somehow. I hope that in the future states change the way tests are administered, and I hope more people advocate for less test taking.

2 comments:

  1. Good point about the testing taking valuable teaching time away from the students, Elizabeth. I never understood who thought testing kids for a week was beneficial. Weekly vocabulary tests, chapter tests for math, semester exams... how many more assessments really need to be done?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am definitely with you on not being an advocate for standardized testing. I always hated it, and I laughed when you brought up the point about the children only liking the snacks that are provided during testing week; I remember being in elementary school and how everyone would make such a big deal about what snacks we got during our five minute break for testing! I really did love this article, and I'm excited to see what our group can come up with because we all chose different aspects of the article to analyze!

    ReplyDelete